Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
10466
Download
573
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2014 ) 13 , 403 - 409

Research article
Acute Effects of Static and Dynamic Stretching on Balance, Agility, Reaction Time and Movement Time
Dimitris Chatzopoulos1, , Christos Galazoulas1, Dimitrios Patikas2, Christos Kotzamanidis1
Author Information
1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Greece
2 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Dimitris Chatzopoulos
✉ Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
Email: chatzop@phed.auth.gr
Publish Date
Received: 13-01-2014
Accepted: 31-01-2014
Published (online): 01-05-2014
Share this article
 
 
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of three different stretching protocols on balance, agility, reaction time and movement time of the upper limbs. Participants were thirty one female high school athletes (age = 17.3 ± 0.5 yr.). All participants performed one of the following protocols on different days: (a) 3 min jogging followed by 7 min static stretching (SS), (b) 3 min jogging followed by 7 min dynamic stretching (DS), and (c) 3 min jogging followed by 7 min of rest (NS). After the protocols participants performed the following tests: dynamic balance, 505 agility test, reaction time (time between a sound stimulus and release of a button) and movement time (movement of the upper extremity over a 0.5 m distance). The order of stretching protocols and performance tests were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for all variables except reaction time. The DS protocol compared to SS performed significantly better in balance, agility and movement time. Additionally, the DS protocol compared to NS performed significantly better in agility. According to the results of the study, a DS protocol is more appropriate than SS for activities that require balance, rapid change of running direction (agility) and movement time of the upper extremities.

Key words: Warm-up exercise, muscle stretching exercises, sports performance, adolescents


           Key Points
  • Static stretching has a negative effect on balance and agility performance compared to dynamic stretching.
  • There was no effect of the stretching protocols on reaction time.
  • Dynamic stretching was more effective than static stretching for increasing movement time of the upper extremities.
 
 


JSSM | Copyright 2001-2017 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.